Alerts will be sent to your verified email
Verify EmailOLAELEC
The base thesis requires service recovery, sustained registration momentum, Gen 3 scale-up and a successful Roadster ramp, with Cell & Energy reaching commercial scale behind them.
The bull path comes from faster motorcycle adoption, stronger automotive utilisation, quicker energy-storage expansion and better fixed-cost absorption.
The bear path is triggered by stalled service or registrations, delayed cell yields and storage qualification, or price competition that prevents scale and keeps margins under pressure.
Executive Snapshot:
Competitive Position: Wide Moat (Network Effects) — The platform holds a dominant liquidity advantage with 222K paying suppliers and 42M active buyers. However, the moat is Stable rather than widening. While network effects protect against new entrants, they are not currently driving new usage velocity at the bottom of the pyramid (Silver tier churn is high), indicating saturation or value-proposition mismatch for smaller SMEs.
| Scenario | Probability | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Base Case | 55-60% | Supplier base grows 3-4% CAGR; Revenue growth driven by 8-10% ARPU hikes; Margins stabilize ~35% due to reduced acquisition spend. |
| Bear Case | 25-30% | Elevated risk. Triggered if Standalone Collections growth stays <10% for 2 more quarters OR if entry-level churn forces price rollbacks. (See Section 5). |
| Bull Case | 15-20% | Requires specific breakout in 'Busy Infotech' scaling (>30% CAGR) AND successful stabilization of Silver bucket churn leading to >6K net adds/quarter. |
Base case probability is anchored by the persistent disconnect between management's aspiration (20%+ growth) and actual delivery (12% Consolidated Revenue growth in Q2 FY26). The Bear case is elevated above standard 20% because the core standalone engine shows signs of saturation (net additions were negative in Q3 FY25 and only modestly recovered to +2.8K in Q2 FY26).
Note: Base Year FY25 Actuals used. FY26 estimates annualized based on H1 FY26 actuals (Q1+Q2).
| Metric | FY25 (A) | FY26 (E) | FY27 (E) | FY28 (E) | FY29 (E) | FY30 (E) | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue (Rs. Cr) | |||||||
| - Base Case (55-60%) | 1,388 | 1,585 | 1,805 | 2,055 | 2,340 | 2,665 | 13.7% |
| - Bear Case (25-30%) | – | 1,550 | 1,675 | 1,810 | 1,935 | 2,050 | 8.1% |
| - Bull Case (15-20%) | – | 1,620 | 1,945 | 2,330 | 2,800 | 3,360 | 19.3% |
| EBITDA (Rs. Cr) | |||||||
| - Base Case (55-60%) | 523 | 555 | 650 | 780 | 915 | 1,065 | 15.2% |
| - Bear Case (25-30%) | – | 535 | 550 | 580 | 600 | 615 | 3.8% |
| - Bull Case (15-20%) | – | 580 | 740 | 930 | 1,150 | 1,410 | 22.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 37.7% | 35.0% | 36.0% | 38.0% | 39.1% | 40.0% | |
| PAT | 551 | 580 | 675 | 810 | 960 | 1,120 | 15.2% |
| PAT Margin | 39.7% | 36.6% | 37.4% | 39.4% | 41.0% | 42.0% | |
This section breaks down the total projected revenue increase (Base Case) into its component drivers.
ARPU Expansion & Tier Migration (~60% / Rs.648 Cr)
Net New Supplier Volume (~20% / Rs.216 Cr)
Accounting Software (Busy Infotech) (~15% / Rs.162 Cr)
Other Income/Adjacencies (~5% / Rs.54 Cr)
4.1 Revenue Growth Assumptions
4.2 Margin Trajectory Rationale
4.3 Key Risks to Estimates
4.4 Execution/Credibility Note
4.5 Data Limitations
Bear Case (FY30 Revenue Rs.2,050 Cr, 25-30% Prob):
Bull Case (FY30 Revenue Rs.3,360 Cr, 15-20% Prob):
Report is AI-generated and may contain inaccuracies. Analysis based on regulatory filings up to 2 hours prior to request.
| in % | Sep'24 | Dec'24 | Mar'25 | Jun'25 | Sep'25 | Dec'25 | Mar'26 | Jun'26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 34.59 | 34.59 | 32.97 |
|
|
36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 36.78 | 34.59 | 34.59 | 32.97 |
|
Bhavish Aggarwal
|
30.02 | 30.02 | 30.02 | 30.02 | 30.02 | 27.83 | 27.83 | 26.52 |
|
Ani Technologies Private Limited
|
3.64 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.47 |
|
Indus Trust (through its trustee AnkushAggarwal
|
3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 2.98 |
|
Pisces Eservices Private Limited
|
0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Krutrim Cloud Private Limited
|
— | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
BA Family Office LLP
|
0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Krutrim Data Centre Private Limited
|
— | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Krutrim Silicon Private Limited
|
0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Ola Stores Technologies Private Limited
|
0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
OLA Foundation
|
0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
Ola Singapore Pte Ltd
|
— | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
63.22 | 63.22 | 63.22 | 63.22 | 63.22 | 65.41 | 65.41 | 67.03 |
|
|
9.34 | 6.63 | 5.82 | 7.34 | 10.02 | 11.36 | 11.01 | 16.27 |
|
Motilal Oswal Large And Midcap Fund
|
— | — | — | — | 2.40 | 2.75 | 3.20 | 5.50 |
|
Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund
|
1.66 | 1.99 | — | 1.28 | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.43 | 1.71 |
|
|
53.88 | 56.58 | 57.40 | 55.88 | 53.19 | 54.05 | 54.40 | 50.77 |
|
Individual < 2 lac
|
8.06 | 9.85 | 12.01 | 13.94 | 17.33 | 21.21 | 22.22 | 19.84 |
|
Svf Ii Ostrich (De) Llc
|
17.83 | 17.83 | 17.83 | 17.83 | 14.70 | 14.04 | 13.49 | 12.27 |
|
OEM Employees Welfare Trust (through it's trustee Amit Anchal)
|
5.48 | 5.33 | 5.27 | — | 4.87 | 4.83 | 4.75 | 4.51 |
|
Internet Fund Iii Pte. Ltd.
|
4.90 | 4.90 | 3.45 | 3.24 | — | — | — | — |
|
Shares held by Custodians - DR
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
No. of Shareholders
|
1,425,352 | 1,569,436 | 1,672,130 | 1,672,492 | 1,937,916 | 1,991,261 | 1,953,658 | 1,944,870 |